First, I have never used the term "multilingual", second, I have always speak about IDN identifiers. These are the terms I have been very careful. If I have given you the impression to argue for something more then these, then I think my message have not get cross yet. In one word, I am arguing for John's layer two stuff to be dealt with in his layer one, is this multilingual? I think this is the difference we have started from beginning, from allowing TC/SC in [nameprep]. This is nothing to do with "multilingual".
Liana On Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:18:23 +0800 "James Seng/Personal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Additional notes: > > This is nothing to do with "close minded". I am just not interested > to > get muddy with the discussion, just like the murky topic of > definition > of hostnames. But I be happy to watch by the side to see the > discussion > to see if there is any conclusion. > > language vs script does not implies anything about "tags". If you > referring some solution you or someone else proposed, that certainly > does not cross my mind. > > I am just not interested to discuss "multilingual domain names". If > you > *think* it is possible, please go on. Just dont involve me, > *please*. > The only reason I am even writing this is because you address your > mail > to me. > > -James Seng > > > Thank you, I like your conclusion very much, so you are close > > minded about using tags, is that correct? > > > > Liana >
