> There are certainly many other questions that this proposal (for > which there is no Internet Draft, by the way) brings up. >
I know we are not suppose to discuss things which has no I-D... so let me just sneak in one final comment... Although I have said that Tseng's suggestions (converting the current registrations of ASCII-.com to ML-.com and converting ASCII-ccTLD to ML-ccTLD, etc.) are strange (for reasons that are not important), I must say his suggestions certainly has my vote. I have always believe that all the IDN problems we currently face can easily be solved with ML-TLD (aka <idn>.<idn>). Thanks, Ben
