Dear All: In the draft , http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-idn-idna-06.txt define the single Unicode code point as follow:
Unicode [UNICODE] is a coded character set containing tens of thousands of characters. A single Unicode code point is denoted by "U+" followed by four to six hexadecimal digits, while a range of Unicode code points is denoted by two hexadecimal numbers separated by "..", with no prefixes. My question are: Q1: U+hhhh can be represented as u+hhhh or not ? Q2: Here U+HHHH is not a hostname , does it MUST be forced to lower u+hhhh or not in nameprep ? Q3: Puny code draft accept U+hhhh or u+hhhh to let the final encoded ASCII character (last character of corresponding encoded code point) with case upper or lower. I hope draft authors can help to clarify these interconnection point . L.M.Tseng ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Seng/Personal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 9:20 PM Subject: Thread on - Re: [idn] Prohibit CDN code points > Dear all, > > I was offline for 2 days and just finished reading 60+ message on this > thread alone. > > While it is very interesting, I would like to remind everyone that in > order to make working group progress, we should focus our discussion on > "core interest". > > The "core interest" of the group after SLC: > > Requirements of Internationalized Domain Names > (draft-ietf-idn-requirements) > Internationalizing Host Names In Applications (IDNA) > (draft-ietf-idn-idna) > Preparation of Internationalized Host Names (draft-ietf-idn-nameprep) > Proposal for a determining process of ACE identifier > (draft-ietf-idn-aceid) > AMC-ACE-Z version 0.2.1(draft-costello-idn-amc-ace-z) renamed as > Punycode version 0.3.3 (draft-ietf-idn-punycode-00) > > Therefore, it would be better if we bring all discussion outside core > interest offline. We should focus on our current action item, namely: > > 1. Decision on Requirements Document > > Since there is no further feedback on the issues of dropping the > requirements, then we should drop it from the pool. > > There is also no volunteer for the replacement doc so we will put > the idea on hold until we find one. > > 2. WG Last Call for IDNA, Nameprep, AMC-ACE-Z (aka punycode) > > We should be doing it anytime now, hopefully within this week. > > -James Seng > >
