Same old discussion. Response is already in the archive http://www.imc.org/idn/mail-archive/msg04621.html
-James Seng ----- Original Message ----- From: "xiang deng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Chun-Hsin Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "James Seng/Personal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2002 9:33 AM Subject: Re: Inputting mixed SC/TC (Re: [idn] A question...) > Dear Ted, > > Thanks for your comment. > Discussion make issue more clearly. > > we are clear: > 1. Current IDNA is a good solution. > 2. IDNA ONLY will be detrimental to Chinese Internet Community. > 3. IDN WG chairs' express: it's out of scope. But decision maker is not > family with Chinese character and never use Chinese character in daily life. > 4. Chinese Internet community object IDNA ONLY solution. > 5. Unicode haven't finish the equivalent set of Chinese character. > > from 1. we get: It's based on all member's hard work. > from 2. we get: IDNA ONLY is not enough to solve Chinese character issue. > from 3. we get: If IDN WG chairs don't consider the detriment, Chinese. > Internet Community have responsibility to solve it for Chinese Internet future > and Chinese users before the detriment become true. > from 4. we get: IDNA ONLY solution lost the basis to be widely applicated. > from 5. we get: If Unicode begin this work, it'll refer to "A complete set of Chinese > Simplified Character", so it is a good beginning of next step. > > Best regards > Deng xiang >
