Patrik writes: > You just asked for "certain mappings and no others".
Liar. I started by quoting two lines from Klensin saying that TC/SC was ``not analogous to case-mapping.'' I then quoted Seng's TC/SC response, and said ``This answer destroys the stated reasons for case-mapping.'' > I don't understand where you get "lying" from? I attribute your behavior to malice because it cannot be adequately explained by stupidity. It is simply not possible to read my message without observing that I was talking about case-mapping. This is not the first time that you have blatantly misrepresented the statements of people who object to IDNA. I have heard, by the way, that some of your company's products are not 8-bit-clean: in particular, they fail to handle UTF-8 transparently. Is this true? Your position on the IESG gives you substantial power to elevate your company's interests above the interests of the community; you have a clear conflict of interest if you are making decisions on proposals that affect your company's products. ---D. J. Bernstein, Associate Professor, Department of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computer Science, University of Illinois at Chicago
