--On 16. mars 2002 02:21 +0000 "D. J. Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There certainly isn't IDN WG consensus on IDNA as the long-term IDN > solution. In fact, many of us suspect that there's consensus on the > following statement, which implies that IDNA is merely temporary: > > The long-term IDN solution will encode Unicode characters as UTF-8 on > the wire. > If this was reformulated as The long-term IDN solution will not use DNS it would have my vote.
- Re: [idn] WG last call summary Dave Crocker
- Re: [idn] WG last call summary Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] WG last call summary Adam M. Costello
- Re: [idn] WG last call summary Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] WG last call summary Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] WG last call summa... Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] WG last call s... Dave Crocker
- Re: [idn] WG last call s... Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] WG last call s... Dave Crocker
- Re: [idn] WG last call s... Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] WG last call summary Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [idn] WG last call summary Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] WG last call summary Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] WG last call summary Dave Crocker
- Re: [idn] WG last call summary Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] WG last call summary Dave Crocker
- Re: [idn] WG last call summary Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] WG last call summary Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] WG last call summary Keith Moore
- Re: [idn] WG last call summa... Eric A. Hall
- Re: [idn] WG last call s... Adam M. Costello
