"Doug Ewell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Soobok Lee <lsb at postel3 dot postel dot co dot kr> wrote: > >> What if proper and stable implementation of legacy encodings in >> IDNA is not a tangilbe object due to their frequent updates/ >> additions ? > > How "frequent" are updates to legacy encodings, or updates to the > mapping tables between legacy encodings and Unicode?
The problem seem to be that there are no official mapping tables between legacy encodings and Unicode. So each implementator can in theory chose whatever mapping tables she wishes, and change it every other day as well. In practice, implementator will pick a table they find on the net. Question is if this is sufficient or not, are all mapping tables "on the net" consistent and non-evolving? > -Doug Ewell > Fullerton, California > (would prefer to receive only one copy of these messages) Setting "Mail-Copies-To: never" helps.
