Email berikut bermula dari diskusi di milis ccTLD mengenai penggunaan DNS server selain BIND. Ditanyakan apakah ada ccTLD yang menggunakan DNS server lain dan bagaimana dengan performancenya? dll.
Mungkin ada rekan-rekan yang suka ngulik yang bisa melakukan perbandingan dan menceritakan pengalamannya? Regards -- budi ----- Forwarded message from Daniel Karrenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- From: Daniel Karrenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [cctld-discuss] ccTLD not using BIND Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2002 08:37:06 +0200 [note that I am not reading the lists regularly] Sebastian, You may want to look at nsd: http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/nsd/index.en.html This is an authoritative-only server designed to provide open source code diversity from bind. It has *very* nice performance characteristics established in comprehensive lab tests using real queries to the root, .de and .nl. It is free and open source. I have been involved in the design and done the testing part. The test results are published and included in the distribution as well. The main motivation for writing nsd were concerns about the lacking code diversity at the root and TLD levels of the DNS that were voiced late last year. Thus I will be happy to support anyone in that region of the DNS tree to deploy it. A very short presentation about it can be found at http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/archive/ripe-42/presentations/ripe42-plenary-nsd/ A more extensive one at http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/archive/ripe-42/presentations/ripe42-dns-aons/index.html A thorough description of the testing and the observed differences between the answers of bind8 and nsd can be found at http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/archive/ripe-42/presentations/ripe42-dns-distel The details about the regression tests are part of the distribution too. Daniel _______________________________________________ ----- End forwarded message ----- _______________________________________________ Idnic mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.idnic.net.id/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/idnic
