FYI, Dalam diskusi di ccTLD, masalah policy dari zone transfer menjadi sebuah masalah besar. Intinya adalah: - IANA mengharuskan ccTLD untuk memperbolehkan IANA melakukan zone transfer. (Ini ditekankan pada ICP-1 dan tidak pada RFC 1591!) Banyak TLD yang merasa keberatan dikarenakan ini dianggap pelanggaran terhadap privacy client mereka dan disebabkan tidak adanya perjanjian resmi antara ccTLD dan IANA tentang ICP-1. (Diskusinya *rame* sekali!) - Kita (.ID) memperkenankan zone transfer ke IANA - Tapi kita tidak memperkenankan/menyediakan whois. (Sebaliknya banyak TLD yang menyediakan whois) Dalam pandangan saya, lucu sekali kalau tidak memperbolehkan zone transfer tapi memperbolehkan whois dengan alasan privacy. Whois memiliki data-data yang lebih lengkap (pendaftar, alamat, dll.) dibandingkan dengan data-data yang ada di zone files (hanya teknis saja).
-- budi ----- Forwarded message from Josh Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- Subject: RE: [cctld-discuss] ICANN Zone Access FAQ From: "Josh Elliott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 09:33:39 -0700 Thanks, Kim. First, let me say that I am encouraged by IANA's attempt to fix this very serious problem. In the case of .CX, it took IANA 2 months to make a requested nameserver addition to the root. Q15 (Has IANA always required access to zone files?) and Q16 (Has the IANA always exercised its access to check zone files at the time of nameserver changes?) are partly inaccurate. Further explanation below: I can only speak to my operational experience at IANA from 1996-2000. Prior to 1996, only Joyce Reynolds would have operational experiences. Q15 - IANA always required access to zone files upon delegation, and it was our desire that ccTLDs keep the zones open continuously, but if they didn't, we DID NOT refuse nameserver changes or any other TLD update. As most of you know, this policy was never strictly enforced or stated until the creation of ICP-1. I believe the intention of ICP-1 was to create greater stability among ccTLD operations and to also create a closer relationship between IANA and ccTLD managers. This backfired for numerous reasons, but primarily due to IANA's inability/unwillingness to communicate and work constructively with the ccTLD community during the first 18 months of ICANN's stewardship of IANA. Q16 - Beginning in 1996, we did not strictly enforce any AXFR requirement, especially with managers we knew and trusted. Again, zone file access was not a serious requirement, and the IANA's inability to transition from a soft policy to a strict one has led us to this current crisis. Furthermore, there was not a problem of dedicated IANA resources during the 1999-2001 period under ICANN, but rather a desire from IANA's perspective to maintain relatively fast TLD changes and continue building good relationships with TLD managers. I hope IANA will modify this FAQ accordingly. Josh Josh Elliott .CX Policy Board Advisor >-----Original Message----- >From: Kim Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:08 AM >Subject: [cctld-discuss] ICANN Zone Access FAQ > >Dear all, > >ICANN had just released this document on Zone Transfers: > > > http://www.iana.org/faqs/tld-zone-access-faq.htm > > >kim >-- > Kim Davies - Technical Policy Officer > Council of European National TLD Registries > direct: +43 662 872563 12; main: +44 1865 332400 > www.centr.org ----- End forwarded message ----- _______________________________________________ Idnic mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.idnic.net.id/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/idnic
