On 5/11/2020 10:21 AM, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
The question is, what responsibility is being claimed?
....
Tagging keys with aim= would allow senders to choose an appropriate selector under different circumstances.
If signers want to have a standardized means of indicating the fine-grained semantics behind their signature, they can do that without modifying DKIM.
Rather, define and use a header field that specifies DKIM signing policy. Cover it with the DKIM signature, of course.
The only interesting part of this task is deciding on a standard set of policy labels.
Oh, and then figuring out why and how they are useful to provide... d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list Ietf-dkim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
