Funny you all should ask! I coauthored a paper about exactly this earlier this year:
https://eprint.iacr.org/2019/390 ==Mike > On Aug 10, 2020, at 7:06 PM, Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> On 10/08/2020 23:36, Brandon Long wrote: >> Isn't publishing the private key the opposite of recovery? >> >> Ie, it's basically a mechanism for plausible deniability. >> >> "The key is public, anyone could have made that message." > > Yep. And for DKIM, it's a mechanism I'd myself like to see > well-defined and used. > > Cheers, > S. > <0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc> > _______________________________________________ > Ietf-dkim mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
