On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 10:29 AM Michael Thomas <m...@mtcc.com> wrote:
> On 3/24/23 6:19 PM, Barry Leiba wrote: > > I don't agree with the premise. I think what was tried and didn't > > work should be documented in the result that the working group comes > > out with, but not in the problem statement. > > There isn't a place in the charter/milestones for that. The charter identifies these possible outputs in some combination: (1) a clear problem statement; (2) one or more protocol update document(s); (3) a statement of some kind that the WG determined no feasible protocol solution exists (and, one would hope, how it reached this conclusion); (4) an update to current DKIM operational advice with respect to the stated problem. The only constraint in the charter is that (2) and (3) are mutually exclusive. I believe that a history of what techniques were previously tried and failed could arguably go into any of them. The charter is neither prescriptive or proscriptive on this point. -MSK, ART AD
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list Ietf-dkim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
