That is, to the extent that you disagree about its relevance, it will
help to hear specifics, rather than your asking a generic question
that throws a burden of proof back on the document author, without
providing them any indication what criteria you are applying here or
any detail about why you think it not relevant.
The burden of proof is always on the document author. As it should be.
Extraordinary claims, extraordinary evidence, etc.
Mike
_______________________________________________
Ietf-dkim mailing list
Ietf-dkim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
