Matthäus Wander wrote in <25cebd13-10a2-4b56-887a-f5bcaf0e0d46@wander.science>: |David Harris wrote on 2024-03-22 13:25: |> I now have my implementation complete: I was wondering if there is a |> recommended way of testing it - for instance, a reference site that \ |> allows you |> to send messages and then replies with information about the correctness \ |> of |> your implementation, or an application that can generate signatures \ |> for data |> you supply, showing its work product (the various hashes and canonicaliz\ |> ed |> forms) so you can compare it with your own. | |Maybe this one helps: |https://wander.science/projects/email/dkimtest/ | |Ed25519 is supported.
Thanks for this! Unfortunately i did not discover it earlier. I mean, i had dkimpy (and dkimpy-milter) here, but it wants a fully blown setup and installation, ie: access to DNS and all that, the entire python3 infrastructure. (When i extend my -sign for full operation somewhen in autumn i hope i can somehow implement a test mode where the public (DNS) keys can be fed in via some option.) --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt) _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list Ietf-dkim@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim
