On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 10:20 AM Michael Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> That is, it's possible we specifically do not want a DKIM verifier to > be able to claim success over a DKIM2 signature, accidentally or otherwise. > > I think I don't want an existing DKIM verifier to be able to provide > > some sort of result for a DKIM2 signature. I foresee much confusion > > resulting from that. > > This presupposes some solution which is not available that I've seen. > Absent a document to evaluate, I'm not sure why we're positing backward > incompatibility as if it were a given. > I think it's helpful to converge on a guideline or a starting point. I think that's what we're trying to do here. (We're also, I think, trying to answer the question you asked at the top of this thread.) -MSK
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
