Also, agreed with the existing proposed agenda items. Happy to help generate the slides. Both points are closely related, so it may be more of a joint discussion. -Wei
On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 1:36 PM Wei Chuang <[email protected]> wrote: > Can we discuss the next steps for PQC signing for DKIM/DKIM2? I think the > algorithm choice has settled on ML-DSA-44 but there is debate around hybrid > and non-hybrid constructs. This risks repeating some of the contentious > conversations that already occurred in the TLS WG. One saving grace is > that DKIM2 supports multiple signatures per DKIM2 signature header field, > which might offer a solution. Alternatively it could be whatever approach > people want to rally behind. > -Wei > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 1:20 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Colleagues, >> >> This is a reminder that we have an interim meeting scheduled for >> 13:00-15:00 PDT (20:00-22:00 UTC) on Wednesday, September 23rd. >> >> Proposed agenda items: >> >> * From header field authentication (Richard?) >> * Modifying DMARC to support DKIM2 (Wei?) >> * AOB >> >> Please suggest changes to the above or any additions by COB Monday, >> September 21st. >> >> -MSK, for the Chairs >> _______________________________________________ >> Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >> >
_______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
