Hello Mauro De Gennaro. Mauro De Gennaro wrote in <[email protected]>: ... |header size limits in bytes and found nothing. BCP 7.5 covers the number \ ...
This is a very important message of yours, if i may say that. This topic was brought up i think about two years ago, or so, and i think it was Hannah Stern who did so. And i hope that i have said that software must adapt (for my thing, DKIM/ACDC, anyway). It must treat DKIM signatures in a special way, and must trust the DKIM/ACDC (i stay so) implementation to make the right decisions (reject or accept that is). It may have special knobs to enable this behavior, but email has to become more holistic to become a safe and secure communication, and that transparently and comprehensible so to users. (For DKIM/ACDC we also could or do loose ARC, Authentication-Results, DMARC, SPF, etc, which reduces complexity by a not small amount, in parts reflected by the message size.) Thank you very much for bringing this up again, and the data collection, too! --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt) _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
