It appears that William Weiner <[email protected]> said: >Tero, > >+1 to hashing MIME parts separately.
We have considered this in the past and rejected it because it makes the diff and reconstruction vastly more complicated and fragile. >A Recipe that can undo a removal has to carry the removed content forward. If >a safety filter strips a >malicious content, the removed content travels on in the Message-Instance >headers, and anything that >reconstructs would put it back. A filter whose purpose is removal will choose >a null body Recipe and >under -09 that means the message cannot be fully verified. Please see the previous hundred messages or so on that topic addressing why that's not a problem. R's, John _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
