John Levine wrote in <[email protected]>: |It appears that Viktor Dukhovni <[email protected]> said: |>On Tue, Nov 10, 2026 at 04:59:47PM -0500, John Levine wrote: |> |>> My guess is that they'll eventually bite the bullet and say that \ |>> TCP support, which has always |>> been nominally required is now really required, but it'll take a while. |> |>TCP is already required now: ... | |Sure, but there are still a dismaying number of middleboxes and antique \ |devices where it doesn't work. | |That's what I meant by nominally required to really required.
TCP was in RFC 1035 already. The problem is that (a) it is the fallback for resolvers, (b) the UDP part may already have sent two (v4, v6) packets before instead of only one, and (c) that PQ algorithm is simply a brain damage use case for DKIM, which is why DKIM does not use it. --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt) _______________________________________________ Ietf-dkim mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
