Earl Hood wrote: > the end-user may have little "real" choice.
That's the time when being support@ must be interesting. <eg> For unrelated reasons I've done that (new address) once, took me almost a year, and in two cases I never managed to replace the old address (it still works, but I check it rarely). > the cost of changing providers is high and cumbersome. Indeed, but not impossible, if you do it incrementally. Ordinary users of a domain are always screwed if the owner changes the rules. Features like DKIM (or SPF) "per-user-policies" might be nice, but expensive. It is also a technical challenge, as William eplained it. > Reply-to is limited. Yes, better reserve it for special cases requiring a manual interventions, and don't (ab)use it as default- bypass for whatever. [in another article] | Gmail does the following when using an alternate From: | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apparently a case of 2476(bis) 8.1 "may add sender" in preparation for PRA. What would they do if there is already a Sender set by the submitter ? Bye, Frank _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org