----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Ellermann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
> A jabber log is now also available: > http://www.xmpp.org/ietf-logs/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/2005-11-07.html Ned Freed gets the "Oscar" for the following statement: "And my point is that the things you claim DKIM will break are already broken. DKIM isn't going to break them any more." Other notable statement, (I can't tell who): "the problem is that DKIM has lots of potential that scares the **** out of us." For whom I have recommended reading: "Who moved my cheese?" http://www.whomovedmycheese.com/ My personal comments: "The big picture will required an integrated solution, that only a few players can do and we hate them all." "Why not just fix SPF?" Rephrasing Ned: "Its already broken! That is why we are here." For which I add: "We broke it, it own it. Therefore we fix it." About the unknown: "We can lead the sysop to DKIM, not what he will do with it." About the greater good: "Breaking is in the eyes of the beholder!" "Spam all you want!... as long its not for me." "Tell me again why how I should spent my money?" -- Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc. http://www.santronics.com _______________________________________________ ietf-dkim mailing list http://dkim.org
