Douglas Otis wrote:
On Jan 4, 2006, at 9:43 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
What concern do you have regarding the unfair treatment and
disruptions the SSP mechanism permits.
Neat trick. I nearly fell for it:-)
I have no concerns about ssp that I'd state more than 100 times.
You have no concerns?
Please turn off your rhetoric generator. Its a bit stuck:-)
> Can you provide a generalization of the concern
that you have?
I could. Though I wouldn't make a generic comment if I could
make a much more easily understood specific remark. But just
because I could type something doesn't make it useful to do
so now. So I won't.
...And if you believe that people paying attention to this list are
enlightened by repetition then I suspect you're mistaken. My guess is
that they'll stop reading your posts, never mind spend time
considering what you're trying to say.
A lack of activity on the list suggests many things.
Your response is irrelevant to the statement above. But I still hope
you got the message. I guess we'll see.
Generalizations
[...deleted - please do read the subject...]
Stephen.
_______________________________________________
ietf-dkim mailing list
http://dkim.org