On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 09:29:58PM -0600, Paul Hoffman allegedly wrote: > Why is a binary representation "much needed"? A 2048-bit key will > only take up 320 of the 512 bytes allowed. Or am I missing something?
Actually, the encoding cost is only a constraint if you want to store the key in some human renderable form. AFAIK, nothing stops a TXT from containing the full 256 range of byte values. Though that suggestion will surely cause more affront to those who abhor the use of TXT in the first instant. Mark. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html