On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 08:51:44AM -0700, Douglas Otis wrote: > Trust annotation could highlight a message or place it into a special > folder, for example. > > Not all sources within a domain are equally vetted. > > Increased use of sub-domains may weaken DKIM as a trust mechanism; > which domain name should be trusted?
So given this as a parent domain: example.com and these as subdomains of the parent domain: transactional admin system bulk which one should be trusted? I'd say none. > Well vetted sources can be indicated by the signer with some type of > notation or semaphore. > > Signer trust semaphores should be coupled with the signature. <snip the rest> I do like this semaphore/opaque token idea. I think it answers Laura Mathers' question (at the sender authentication summit) about MUA's showing only quoted parts. -- :: Jeff Macdonald | Principal Engineer, Messaging Technologies :: e-Dialog | [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: 131 Hartwell Ave. | Lexington, MA 02421 :: v: 781-372-1922 | f: 781-863-8118 :: www.e-dialog.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
