We do have draft-allman-dkim-ssp-01; is there any problem with using
that as a starting point?
As Stephen says, it's in our charter as a starting point. But we have
to consider it *a* starting point, because we've already seen at least
two more views on what a signing policy/practices/poodle should look
like, and they differ enough that we need to review them as separate IDs
first. I certainly expect that allman-dkim-ssp will be one of those we
review.
Barry
--
Barry Leiba, Internet Messaging Technology ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.research.ibm.com/people/l/leiba
http://www.research.ibm.com/spam
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
