> We all (or almost all) seem to be assuming that the DNS is the
> place to put SSP stuff.
>
> I just wanted to raise the question to see if that's a requirement
> or just a near-accidental part of the current design proposals.
I suppose that since the rest of DKIM is in DNS it seems logical to put
the policy part of DKIM in DNS also. So, consistency could be one
rational for the "policy in DNS" position.
--
Arvel
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
