Dave Crocker wrote: > Jim Fenton wrote: > >> Stephen Farrell wrote: >> I'll throw out a few generic requirements: >> > > Jim, these all look pretty reasonable, but they are all about the mechanism > rather than being about sender signing practices, per se. > Sure. I was responding to Stephen's question about where/how SSP stuff is published. I wasn't trying to address what the SSP consists of.
-Jim _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
