----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Damon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> There has been suggestion in the past of the desire for a policy > for "I sign everything, don't accept a message with *any* > third party signatures". I've yet to see why anybody would > want to set such a policy in real life though. hmmm, Isn't this "highly exclusive" policy just happens to be the most powerful protection the DKIM protocol has to offer? If made available, the highest protection, will be the most likely policy used... in real life. -- Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc. http://www.santronics.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html