On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 10:07:52 -0700 Dave Crocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Bottom Line: > > Although it is essential that a protocol specification be deployed only >after due deliberation, it is equally essential that it be concise, coherent and >compelling. > > In other words the market needs to understand it and needs to believe its >adoption is important... for the near term. > >All of this argues strongly for the criterion I suggested. > OK, but that's all fodder for the final design. We are currently discussing requirements. Prematurely cutting off requirements discussion has its own risks. I agree the what we deliver in the end must be as simple as reasoanbly possible, but the time to decide what that is has not yet arrived. Scott K _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
