----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephen Farrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Chair-ish quibble: I think the positions exposed on the list > must of course be covered in reqs-00, but I also think the > more words that are used to do that, the more disagreement we'll > get. Put another way, I hope no-one wants to see a reqs-00 > that has near as many words as have been posted to this list > over the last couple of weeks. +1, I'll be happy with just a fascimile of the following block of words: - Protocol must offer support for the following domain policies: - no mail ever expected by domain - no signature expected whatsoever by domain - domain signature optional, no third party expected - domain signature optional, 3rd party allowed. See below. - domain signature required, 3rd party allowed. See below. - domain signature required, no 3rd party expected - Protocol must support optional "allow list" of domain allowed to sign. Bonus Block of Words: - Protocol must offer optional "Highest Hashing Method Possible" understood by target end point. Maybe MT can just cut and paste this small block of words in and I think reached pareto's ratio! <g> -- Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc. http://www.santronics.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html