Douglas Otis wrote: > It MUST always be the provider offering outbound services, not the > provider receiving messages held accountable. The designators are the > receivers of email. Not the senders and signers. Reputation is about > watching for abuse when it is sent by your customer, even when they > are using their email-address of the day. In that case, you must believe that key delegation and NS delegation do the wrong thing.
SSP Designated Signing Domains have been promoted as making it easier for some domains, particularly small domains, to obtain a first-party signature. But that otherwise the end result is the same. My point is that it isn't: the point of responsibility is different for SSP Designated Signing Domains from the other forms of delegation. -Jim _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
