Dave Crocker wrote:
> all that mundaneness and detail is presumably intended to
> solve some specific set of email community problems.
> What are those problems, specifically?
My POV: Will DKIM offer something that's _better_ than SID ?
The "crypto timestamp" camp apparently wants something that's
better than SpamCop's algorithm coupled with "query abuse.net".
Also interesting, but a different problem.
> Do we have rough consensus on what they are and that they
> need solving right now?
That's probably addressed to the Chairs.
Frank
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
