My problem (although much smaller in scale at this time) exactly Bill Oxley Messaging Engineer Cox Communications, Inc. Alpharetta GA 404-847-6397 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J.D. Falk Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2006 5:18 PM To: IETF-DKIM Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp On 2006-09-06 14:12, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote: > Since you can wildcard the most common case one would need 50,000 SSP > records at most. It is likely that they would be generated > automatically as individual mail servers were configured to use DKIM. > > BITs are cheap. I see no problem in deploying 100,000 DKIM records in > such a situation. How will that scale to the 219,000,000 users that comScore thought Yahoo! Mail had about a year ago? (The actual number is a trade secret, but comScore's close enough for this conversation.) And, have any actual banks actually asked for this, or is it still entirely theoretical? -- J.D. Falk, Anti-Spam Product Manager Yahoo! Communications Platform Team _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
