1st case I sign no mail, It means that if you receive a signed message from me I am amenable to you discarding it unread. In the case that I am a 3rd party signer, the domain setup to do that signing would have a separate administrative domain for exchanging email about the signing domain. Example I help administrate cox.net but all emails concerning that administration go thru cox.com.
2nd case is from offline discussions that revolved about legal accountability of DKIM. Thanks, Bill Oxley Messaging Engineer Cox Communications, Inc. Alpharetta GA 404-847-6397 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: Dave Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 10:58 AM To: Oxley, Bill (CCI-Atlanta) Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] user level ssp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I sign no mail==I only sign other peoples mail (third party signer) No, it does not mean that. To the extent that it is, nonetheless, what you want it to mean, what problem does it solve? You sign other peoples' mail. So what? How does publishing that information solve a demonstrated need? > I sign some mail==I sign some mail from my domain but don't want to be > sued for you getting unsigned spam purportedly from me. So, now we are trying to have SSP solve legal problems? For which jurisdictions? -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
