Dave Crocker wrote: > or what?
It's about mail with one or more Resent-From or Resent-Sender header fields as far as I'm concerned. > all of the discussion about signing by Alice is irrelevant, > since the later focus seems to be on signing by the > re-poster, Bob. Whatever SSP does (and the more interesting case is a "Bob" who is completely DKIM-unaware), the mail should not be rejected by the next receiver(s) no matter what Alice's SSP says. Bob is perfectly entitled to resend a mail he got using the header fields specified in STD 11 or 2822. Where "reject" is of course the least problematic outcome, but "annotate as suspicious", the weasel words for "delete", would be wrong. Frank _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
