Douglas Otis wrote:
On Sep 21, 2006, at 3:53 PM, Michael Thomas wrote:
o DKIM Strict: the state where the domain holder believes that all
legitimate mail purportedly from the domain are sent with a
valid DKIM signature and that non-compliant services are avoided.
What is difficult to understand with this definition? Is a
definition needed for non-compliant services?
How does this differ from scenario #1?
Note that DKIM Strict is not currently defined, but should be.
Doug, this is completely circular so I give up.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
