Steve Atkins wrote: > to summarize, you believe that SSP is drastically less likely > to provide any operational benefit or achieve widespread > deployment than SPF?
I wouldn't compare SPF and SSP, they're mostly unrelated. For a comparison of SenderID and SSP it's hard to judge, the "PRA" concept makes more sense than looking only at the 2822-From. On the other hand SenderID is based on an IP enumeration (like SPF), and DKIM on a signature surviving almost everything excl. "some" (= unfortunately almost all) irregular mailing lists. If SSP sticks to the 2822-From as its method to identify some kind of "authority" for _unsigned_ mails I think it's hopeless. Phil's ideas about updating algorithms could still work, no matter what the rest of SSP tries to achieve. Frank _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
