On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 05:45:16PM +0000, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > Hi All, > > At today's DKIM meeting (notes to follow) we discussed > the in/exclusion of requirement 5.3.10 in ssp-reqs [1] > (the current text is below). We didn't have a clear > consensus at the meeting despite an extended discussion > and a lot of previous list traffic. > We need to decide this now in order to finish the > ssp-reqs work and to start the ssp work, so Barry and > I will collate the responses to this in a week and > we'll then make the call about what to do. > > Wordsmithing is another thing, but we've discussed > this enough to decide now. So, *please* just pick > an option and don't lets divert this to discussing > a different question. > > This is also Issue #1386 in the tracker [2]. > > Your choices:- > > 1) Exclude this requirement (don't mention it) > 2) Include this requirement as a MUST NOT > 3) Include this requirement as a MAY > 4) Inlcude this requirement as a SHOULD > 5) Inlcude this requirement as a MUST
#1 -- :: Jeff Macdonald | Principal Engineer, Messaging Technologies :: e-Dialog | [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: 131 Hartwell Ave. | Lexington, MA 02421 :: v: 781-372-1922 | f: 781-863-8118 :: www.e-dialog.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
