> > On Jun 4, 2007, at 6:34 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: >> Douglas Otis wrote: >>> >>> It is not clear why a "no mail sent" assertion must be excluded >>> from a policy statement. >> >> Well... because that was the concensus. Feel free to re-read the >> archive, but basically: End of story. > > Consensus does not necessarily produce a solution that improves > security.
Are you saying that you'd like to ignore the established WG consensus and plan to continue on discussing this topic on the DKIM WG list regardless of the fact that we've thrashed this and one of the WG chairs has specifically asked you to stop? If the answer is anything synonymous with "no", there's no need to respond, let's just move on. If the answer is anything else, please send it to Barry and I off-list. Stephen. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
