>How can a potential bounce generator know whether this particular message has >a validated return address? Note that the mere presence of a DKIM signature >does not guarantee this particular validation issue. > >That's why the SSP-type record might be necessary.
Personally, I'd rather use BATV. R's, John _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
