On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, Hector Santos wrote:
In sticking to the Subject: of this thread, no, this was not discussed at
the Interop event. SSP was determined early on to be out-of-scope for our
tests. We were focusing only on RFC4871 itself.
How unfortunate.
I disagree. Nobody at the event said SSP was unimportant. But, one thing
at a time; we were only there to evaluate that piece of the protocol that
was already issued by the IETF. SSP is still nascent, so discussing it
there (rather than at IETF or on this list) seemed like an inappropriate
use of our limited time.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html