John Levine wrote: >> Which is a long winded version of that third party signatures are >> completely orthogonal to SSP. "All" should just mean "I sign all of >> my mail". No more, no less. >> > > +1 > > R's, > John > > PS: Mike and I agree on something! Alert the media! >
In that case, what is the SSP result when a message does not contain a valid Originator Signature, and the Originator Domain has a policy of "all"? The whole business about third-party signatures is a DKIM-based mechanism to decide what to say in that case. If the verifier sees another signature that they "like", the result is "not Suspicious". -Jim _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
