>I'm sympathetic to this perspective. I think we have two broad >groups here. One believes that SSP has utility and one believes that >it doesn't.
I wouldn't object to a version of SSP that stuck to publishing senders' practices, and I doubt anyone else would either. Unfortunately, the current draft is about 1/4 sender practices and 3/4 other stuff. It's the other stuff that's the problem. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
