Michael Thomas wrote: > I don't see much if any support for changing the valid > first party signature consensus from rfc 5016, and I've > seen a whole lot of -1's.
I've seen a bunch of objections against the redefinition of originator (i.e. more than Dave+me+Dave+me+Dave+me ;-) Maybe a poll could help to get a clearer picture of your "a whole lot of" and my "a bunch of". If the Chairs like the idea, Harald sometimes uses polls, but it's a matter of taste. Frank _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
