Stephen Farrell wrote: > FWIW, I don't agree that this is just a DoS. At least some of the > issues raised haven't gotten much consideration over the last few > months and if we do want to produce a standards track SSP then we need > to do that level of review.
+1 I share many of Dave's concerns, but he explains them better than I would -- and I'm trying to avoid a flood of +1 messages. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
