Dave Crocker wrote: > The SSP document applies the label "suspicious" to messages that well > might be legitimate and fails to apply it to ones that are not.
Actually, it's "Suspicious" (note the initial capital S) and if the issue is that the term is confusing, that is being tracked as issue #1530. > > At a minimum, the SSP document needs to provide a very clear statement > of the types of problematic messages it will "catch" and the type that > it will not (ie, fail to catch.) This is issue #1527. I recommend that this issue be closed as a duplicate of the above two issues. -Jim _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
