Jim Fenton wrote: > My suggestion: "non-compliant"/"compliant".
If "non-compliant" is actually a "Resent-* as specified in 2822upd with a twist" (signature didn't survive it), then that's rather strong. Why not FAIL ? FAIL is short, neutral, and some folks are used to the idea that FAIL is a defined term. Frank _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html