> > A mailing-list not breaking signatures is a scary idea. This would > > open the door for all sorts of abuse. > > Yesterday, of the 32082 messages that Cisco sent through mailing lists, > 99.6% of them passed verification. Keep your grubby mitts off of the > supposedly broken signatures like RFC4871 says. > > Mike
Exactly, So why again are we demoting broken signatures to No Signature? This promotes ALL to STRICT. Regards, Damon Sauer _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
