Jim Fenton wrote: > We need to make every effort to make everyone know that publishing > 'all' or (particularly) 'strict' is not something that is done > lightly.
+1 It is similar for publishing PRA FAIL and SPF FAIL, so you are not forced to start this education from scratch. In a nutshell policies allowing efficient identification of *suspicious* mails will cut both ways, and limit some uses possible without such policies. Mechanisms allowing only to identify *good* mails like pure DKIM don't have this problem, and on the other hand they can't cut ;-) > I know of tools that are under development to help domain owners > know from where mail from their domains is being sent, and > hopefully this will raise awareness too. It's possible to use the SPF and PRA "exists" mechanism to figure this out, but for SSP with its "first author" you'd miss exactly the interesting cases (for SSP) if you log Mail From or PRA uses. Frank _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
