J D Falk wrote: >> The real world doesn't have multiple from addresses regardless >> of what unearthed arcana somebody found in rfc2822. > +1 > Let's design SSP for the real world.
In another article you wrote: | If we wait long enough, SSP won't even be necessary for the big, | high-value signers & verifiers. If it's all the same for you and "high-value" signers like Yahoo! SSP could as well try to be compatible with the RFC 2822 Sender. Don't be surprised if ignoring Resent-* hurts it in the real world. Focus on Sender is already shaky, SenderID fans might have other ideas, and one SenderID fan controls big parts of the real world. JFTR, I'm no SenderID fan, maybe many Resent-* users also aren't. Frank _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
